Disaster

Sharon,
Okay, so....in spite of the different contour of the Washington coastline, Petunia is still West of the Cascades. The rainyness is the clue.
Love ya,
Katie


Katie;
Yeah, I think so. From her descriptions that sounds like where it is.
Share


This has got to be in the Hoh rainforest.....on the peninsula.
Love ya,
Katie


Sharon,
There must be an awful lot more that happens besides a
series of tsunamis. I can't imagine tsunamis would
have much effect on Seattle. It's so hilly, very
little of the land is that close to sea level. Most of
downtown is a good hundred feet above and the rest,
higher. Now I can see Elliot Bay being wiped out. But
Seattle being on Puget Sound, a tsunami would have to
travel in through the straits of Juan de Fuca and
probably lose momentum in doing so before doing much
to Seattle. The Pacific coast of Washington is not
very populated. Just little towns is all. So I am
thinking a great deal more happens to Washington State
besides tsunamis.

Elias mentions that the world population decreases
significantly during the coming decades. It will be
interesting to see how that all comes about. And it
sounds from Petunia, that it won't be a bad thing to
allow all of it to happen.
Love ya,
Katie



Katie;

Petunia does not wish to lend energy to the ideas of prophecy and mass disengagement due to destruction of the planet whether it is natural disasters, disease, or human causes. In fact that whole sentence doesn’t make sense to her, because it is the idea of separation of the self from the environment or events. There is no separation of the physical body from the environment or events, as they are all one in the same creation.

Not that there wasn’t destruction caused by what we consider natural disaster, but they were dependant on the local and the emotional status of the residents. When individuals or groups did choose to relocate, it was not so much from the effects of upheaval, it was because that was their own intention and creation and it was more assisting them rather than the main factor for the choices made. She says that we still have the tendency from our viewpoint to regard those types of events as being outside of ourselves, in that we believe that reality creates us, not the other way around. Mass events were more considered motivation and desire for adventure, and it made it easier to leave everything behind and create new self-contained communities.

Yes there was mass disengagement for a variety of reasons, but these reasons were based on the individual and their own choices to participate in a particular manner. Society hadn’t fully absorbed that creating an event that caused us to die in a way, which appeared to be against our will, was not actually necessary. And for the most part the individual made those type choices because they did not wish to participate physically in the shifting process, but to lend their energy and support from a subjective state. 

She says that by the time that her people established their own community, around mid-century, societal structures and reflecting building structures were already being abandoned or redesigned. One way to get a ‘feel’ for this is to look at the rapidly increasing number of autistic children being born now. [But she would also like to clarify that the word ‘autism’ is not a disease, rather a blanket statement for unwanted or unacceptable behavior.] We already recognize that in our immediate future, our educational system will not accommodate this new culture of shifty kids, and the same thing shall apply to every other major social system. 

Love,
Share