Sunday, August 3, 2008

anthropogenic global warming

John: Two minutes? OK. Let's see, where do I want to go. I'll talk
about this so-called, this concept of, Val and I were talking about it 
a couple of days ago, the idea of anthropogenic global warming. In 
other words, there's global warming and climate change occurring, and 
most of it has to do with what mankind is doing in terms of emissions,
 and in terms of drilling, and so on and so forth.

She was, looking at the history, was sorting arguing that, well there 
may some tiny impact, but in terms of the delta of change we're
observing now, the magnitude of that delta is no bigger than what it
 has been in other time frameworks when we don't have the technology,
we don't have car emissions, and we don't have off-shore drilling, or 
drilling anywhere, such as in the Early Middle Ages, for example,
where she would claim there's just as much climate change happening
 then as there is now. Or, in, there is, just before the fall of the 
Roman Empire, I think it was certain portion of Northern Europe that
 had a lot of changes.


Would you say there's more of a delta going on now, than there has
been in previous time frameworks?

Elias: Yes.


John: Yes. There is more.


Elias: Yes.


John: I see.

Elias: Is it leading to the destruction of your planet? No, but it can
 be creating significant changes, which will be very impactful.

John: What changes would you point to now that are a direct cause of
 this so-called anthropogenic global…?


Elias: I will offer you an example. Several individuals in this forum
 have been playing with future focuses. One of the obstacles with the 
future focuses is that the configuration of land mass in their time is
 very different from now. Therefore, in that one statement you can 
imagine all of the implications that stem from a significant
 reconfiguration of land mass, and alteration of climate, which affects 
many, many other branches.

Elias - 2586
unpublished session

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I had a dream which I think was triggered by reading your post. Here's a blog I posted about it:

"Yeah, yeah, I know everybody and their grandmother these days has produced psychically-produced maps of what the Earth will look like after some 'Earth changes.' Well, I don't have enough detail to produce my own map, but I had a dream last night about what the US would look like eventually (no time frame given): Texas was almost entirely under water, and much of the western US was, too -- but I guess there were islands here and there due to the Rocky Mountains. Washington State seemed oddly untouched -- which doesn't make sense due to the ocean right next to it, but perhaps the mountains in that state prevent the water from going too far inland? Dunno. I didn't really glimpse much of the eastern US, either. Odd but fun."