petunia confirmed
Originally uploaded by lfdeale
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Sunday, August 3, 2008
anthropogenic global warming
John: Two minutes? OK. Let's see, where do I want to go. I'll talk
about this so-called, this concept of, Val and I were talking about it
a couple of days ago, the idea of anthropogenic global warming. In
other words, there's global warming and climate change occurring, and
most of it has to do with what mankind is doing in terms of emissions,
and in terms of drilling, and so on and so forth.
She was, looking at the history, was sorting arguing that, well there may some tiny impact, but in terms of the delta of change we're observing now, the magnitude of that delta is no bigger than what it has been in other time frameworks when we don't have the technology, we don't have car emissions, and we don't have off-shore drilling, or drilling anywhere, such as in the Early Middle Ages, for example, where she would claim there's just as much climate change happening then as there is now. Or, in, there is, just before the fall of the Roman Empire, I think it was certain portion of Northern Europe that had a lot of changes.
Would you say there's more of a delta going on now, than there has been in previous time frameworks?
Elias: Yes.
John: Yes. There is more.
Elias: Yes.
John: I see.
Elias: Is it leading to the destruction of your planet? No, but it can be creating significant changes, which will be very impactful.
John: What changes would you point to now that are a direct cause of this so-called anthropogenic global…?
Elias: I will offer you an example. Several individuals in this forum have been playing with future focuses. One of the obstacles with the future focuses is that the configuration of land mass in their time is very different from now. Therefore, in that one statement you can imagine all of the implications that stem from a significant reconfiguration of land mass, and alteration of climate, which affects many, many other branches.
Elias - 2586
unpublished session
She was, looking at the history, was sorting arguing that, well there may some tiny impact, but in terms of the delta of change we're observing now, the magnitude of that delta is no bigger than what it has been in other time frameworks when we don't have the technology, we don't have car emissions, and we don't have off-shore drilling, or drilling anywhere, such as in the Early Middle Ages, for example, where she would claim there's just as much climate change happening then as there is now. Or, in, there is, just before the fall of the Roman Empire, I think it was certain portion of Northern Europe that had a lot of changes.
Would you say there's more of a delta going on now, than there has been in previous time frameworks?
Elias: Yes.
John: Yes. There is more.
Elias: Yes.
John: I see.
Elias: Is it leading to the destruction of your planet? No, but it can be creating significant changes, which will be very impactful.
John: What changes would you point to now that are a direct cause of this so-called anthropogenic global…?
Elias: I will offer you an example. Several individuals in this forum have been playing with future focuses. One of the obstacles with the future focuses is that the configuration of land mass in their time is very different from now. Therefore, in that one statement you can imagine all of the implications that stem from a significant reconfiguration of land mass, and alteration of climate, which affects many, many other branches.
Elias - 2586
unpublished session
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)